|
Fantasies of Life and Liberty in America |
|
|
|
|
Written by Keith Humphrey
|
|
Friday, 20 April 2012 20:13 |
|
Hope springs eternal in the faith of
those who love life and liberty. If this world provides little
consolation, we can always take refuge in fiction. For those of us
who yearn to breathe free, the idea that we might somehow have
liberty in our lifetime, is very captivating. 
There are those who hope against hope
that deliverance might somehow come at the federal level. An
embodiment of this idea is expressed in a book by Donald Smith called
“Innocent Blood”. It chronicles in intimate detail the life of
J.D. Maddox, who becomes governor of South Carolina, and then
President of the United States. From this position, he finally
remedies the problem of the shedding of innocent blood via abortion.
Buy Book: "Innocent Blood" by Donald S. Smith
A good writer can develop a character
to the point where you feel like you know them. Donald Smith does
this in excruciating detail. At 810 pages, it is far more than most
people can imagine reading, and I doubt that any of the 536 members
of congress who were sent a free copy, took the time to take a second
glance at it. If you are one of those few people left in this world
who actually reads books, you might be able to handle it. It's a good
story, but it pushes credulity to imagine that there might be some
possibility for redemption at the Federal level, which would
culminate in protection for the lives of the unborn. It also goes a
little overboard with a terrorist plot towards the end, if you can
make it that far.

Another more plausible scenario is
scripted by Patrick Johnston in “The Revolt of 2020”. In it, the
federal government goes beyond the pale in their rabid rage against
life, liberty, and anything decent that might be left in America, and
wages war against pro-life activists from Ohio, and other people like
Patrick Johnston (may I be counted worthy to be among them.)
This pushes the States of Refuge into a
mode where they stand up for what is right, and push back against the
Federal government. Of course Texas leads the charge, and is soon
followed by Montana, Idaho, and others. I have no attachments to the
Lone Star State, but the image of the Texas Guard defying Federal
troops, and enforcing Texas law to close down an abortion clinic; is
something that would make me want to die in the Alamo all over again.
This embodies the philosophy of Christian Exodus, and resonates well.
The absurd part about the story line,
is a sub-plot about Islamic terrorists hijacking airplanes, and
flying them into buildings. This was especially bad fiction when it
was first propagated by the government in 2001, and recycling it a
second time is simply nauseating. This book is only the first in a
trilogy, so this story is a magnum opus as well. It baffles me how a
man of such fervent activity (a father of seven, who runs his own
medical practice in Columbus, Ohio, as well as organizing national
pro-life activities) found the time to write such volumes, but I
guess it is left to very busy men to accomplish the most in their
“spare time”.
Buy Book: "The Revolt of 2020" by Patrick Johnston
A more desperate account is given by
James Wesley Rawles in “Survivors: A Novel of the Coming Collapse”.
In this account, the breakdown of society is so complete, that there
is nothing left to salvage at the Federal or State level, and it is
left to a small band of Christian survivalists in rural Idaho to
preserve the last remnants of American civilization from their
bug-out shelter. Rather than a regular novel, this is a thinly
disguised manual on hardcore survivalism. After reading it, I
couldn't name a single character, or much about them, but I could
recite procedures for guerrilla warfare in the most dire
circumstances. The book is sort of a condensed review of the author's
work at SurvivalBlog.com. Good
reading, but pretty extreme. Personally, I don't believe it will
really play out that badly, but we should keep our powder dry, just
in case.
Buy Book: “Survivors: A Novel of the Coming Collapse” by
James Wesley Rawles
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 20 April 2012 20:36 |
|
New Law: Virginia will not cooperate with NDAA detention |
|
|
|
|
Written by Tenth Ammendment Center
|
|
Friday, 20 April 2012 13:34 |
|
RICHMOND, Va. – On Wednesday, the Virginia legislature overwhelmingly
passed a law that forbids state agencies from cooperating with any
federal attempt to exercise the indefinite detention without due process
provisions written into sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense
Authorization Act.
HB1160
“Prevents any agency, political subdivision, employee, or member of the
military of Virginia from assisting an agency of the armed forces of
the United States in the conduct of the investigation, prosecution, or
detention of a United States citizen in violation of the United States
Constitution, Constitution of Virginia, or any Virginia law or
regulation.”
The legislature previously passed HB1160 and forwarded it to Gov. Bob
McDonnell for his signature. Last week, the governor agreed to sign the
bill with a minor amendment. On Wednesday, the House of Delegates
passed the amended version of the legislation 89-7. Just hours later,
the Senate concurred by a 36-1 vote.
Bill sponsor Delegate Bob Marshall (R-Manassas) says that since the
legislature passed HB1150 as recommended by the governor, it does not
require a signature and will become law effective July 1, 2012.
Several states
recently passed resolutions condemning NDAA indefinite detention, but
Virginia becomes the first state to pass a law refusing compliance with
sections 1021 and 1022.
“In the 1850s, northern states felt that habeas corpus was so
important that they passed laws rejecting the federal fugitive slave
act. The bill passed in Massachusetts was so effective, not one single
runaway slave was returned south from that state. Today, Virginia joins
in this great American tradition,” Tenth Amendment Center executive
director Michael Boldin said. “When the federal government passes
unconstitutional so-called laws so destructive to liberty – it’s the
people and the states that will stand up and say, ‘NO!’ May the other
states now follow the lead taken today by Virginia.”
For more information on the new Virginia law, click HERE. Read More
|
|
Written by Kevin Swanson
|
|
Tuesday, 17 April 2012 13:34 |
|
Geoffrey Botkin, who has been involved with Vision Forum ministries, and various other aggressive initiatives for Christian culture, recently returned from a trip to South Sudan, and was interviewed by Kevin Swanson.
While many of us fantasize about the remote possibility of living in a free Christian nation, the people of South Sudan, who attained their independence only last year, are living the dream. At the same time, the serpentine agents of the United Nations and United States are eagerly trying to bring them into bondage.
Download Interview

By the way, if you have not read Kevin Swanson's book, "The Second Mayflower", I would recommend it you here.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 20 April 2012 20:32 |
|
NDAA Nullification: Tennessee Bills Propose Kidnapping Charges for Federal Agents |
|
|
|
|
Written by Tenth Ammendment Center
|
|
Wednesday, 08 February 2012 12:54 |
|
State and local resistance to the detention provisions contained in
the National Defense Authorization Act continues to grow, rapidly
emerging as a nationwide movement.
The Tennessee legislature will consider HB1629 and SB2669
in the 2012 session. The legislation would effectively nullify the
detention provisions in the NDAA and would also require federal agents
making an arrest in the Volunteer State for any reason to first obtain
written permission from the county sheriff.
This bill declares that any federal law purporting to require
local or state law enforcement agencies to act at the direction of the
federal government or the United States military is beyond the authority
granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States
Constitution, is not recognized by this state, is specifically rejected
by this state and is declared to be invalid in this state. This bill
further declares that any federal law purporting to give federal agents
or employees, including any members of the United States military, the
authority of any state or local law enforcement agency of this state,
without the express permission of this state, is beyond the authority
granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States
Constitution, is not recognized by this state, is specifically rejected
by this state, and is declared to be invalid in this state. Read More
|
|
|