Christian South Carolinians for a free and Constitutional Republic

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Declaration of Cultural Independence

Concepts to consider from the Free Congress Foundation


Once, not so very long ago, America was a good place to live. Families were strong and stable. One breadwinner, almost always the father, brought home enough income to give a whole family a middle class standard of living. Wives and mothers could devote themselves to making good homes and rearing their children. Those children played in safe neighborhoods, surrounded by good neighbors. They went to schools that inculcated discipline, built character and taught reading, writing and arithmetic well. Entertainment was moral, instructive and healthy. Civilization was passed successfully from one generation to another, and even improved a bit along the way.

Today, that America has become a memory. Divorce and illegitimacy have shattered families and crippled children. Taxation and consumerism together have made the single-breadwinner middle class family a rare exception. Children are left to grow up on their own, learning from their peers rather than their parents. Childhood itself is disappearing, as young children are left to face adult situations alone and without guidance.

Public schools have become "attendance centers," as some are now openly called. Some are little more than holding pens for illiterate young ruffians. Few effectively teach even the most basic skills. Rather, their concern is inculcating the "attitudes" demanded by the reigning ideology of Political Correctness.

The entertainment industry is a bottomless sewer, inverting good and evil and flooding the land with sex, violence and degradation of every sort. Video games desensitize children to killing by turning people into objects. Television "normalizes" every deviance, including homosexuality and the inversion of the traditional roles of men and women. Popular music glorifies killers and reduces women to whores.

The high arts are almost dead. Art and architecture are intended to be ugly and alienating. Serious music has become a self-parody. Publishers seek not good writing but "celebrity" authors. The news media values sensationalism over facts.

All these are classic, age-old signs of a culture that is self-destructing. A growing number of Americans know how to read these signs. They realize that, despite economic prosperity, America is becoming a foreign country, foreign to everything that once defined Americans as a people. Indeed, as Political Correctness demands, we are no longer one people. "Multiculturalism" has changed our national motto into ex uno, plura: from one, many.

What is to be done? When a man finds himself in a sewer, his first objective is to get out of it. In a culture that has become a sewer, our first objective must be the same: to get out of that culture, and to create an alternative to it.

Until recently, the objective of cultural conservatives, those Americans who still adhere to our ancient, Western, Judeo-Christian culture, was to retake existing cultural institutions - the public schools, the universities, the media, the entertainment industry and the arts - from those hostile to our culture and make them once again forces for goodness, truth and beauty. We sought to do so primarily through politics, by electing fellow cultural conservatives to high office and expecting them, once elected, to use politics to help restore our traditional culture.

Unfortunately, we must acknowledge that this strategy has not been successful. Despite some political successes, the culture has continued to deteriorate. In part, this is because some of the people we elected abandoned their principles once they were in office. But the larger reason is that culture is more powerful than politics. The tide of cultural degradation and decay is simply too strong for any political barrier to stem.

When one strategy fails, the proper response is not to surrender but to adopt a different strategy. We, the undersigned, therefore pledge ourselves to a strategy of cultural Independence. We hereby declare our Independence from the decayed, modern or post-modern culture and pledge our efforts toward creating new institutions built upon the values of our traditional, inherited Western culture.

We seek nothing less than the creation of a complete, alternate structure of parallel cultural institutions. Home schooling is an example: faced with the failure of the public schools, home schoolers have created a separate, parallel system of education, a system that revives our traditional values and culture and transmits them to a new generation. What home schoolers have done in primary and secondary education, we seek to do also in higher education, media, entertainment, the arts, every aspect of popular and, eventually, high culture as well.

The task is a vast one. But the talents and energies of Americans who still adhere to our traditional culture are also vast. When mobilized effectively, in the late 1970s and 1980s, they had profound if temporary effects on our nation's politics. Now, the challenge is to mobilize them again, not in hopes of evanescent gains in politics, but in service of a more solid goal, the goal of creating our own institutions and through them recovering our identity as a people.

To that task we pledge our talents, our treasure, and our abilities, to work on scales small or great as our circumstances allow. Out of the wreckage of the country once called America we will build a new, moral and pleasant land.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Tax and Spend Progressives

It seems the new Anderson County Economic Development Director Heather Simmons Jones has been on the job for a mere few days but has already warmed up to the idea of adding another tax to the good citizens of the county.

Among the various projects she is batting around in bringing sewer service to the S.C. 24 exit 11 area. Of course to actually make this work the road and bridge must first be widened - to the tune of $130 million.

Lee Luff (Anderson Area Chamber of Commerce) and Holt Hopkins(Transportation Director) are all for this notion and will push again for a 1 cent sales tax in 2008.

Mrs. Jones said of her new job and the possibilities in Anderson - "It's like an economic developer's dream."

That maybe true Mrs. Jones but the short-sighted vision you and other progressives in the county are holding out as a dream is to many decent folks little more than a nightmare come home to roost.

The Greenville urban outgrowth that the progressives see as opportunity many see as blight and the visible represetation of cullture dying.

James Howard Kunstler describes this blight thusly -

Just returned from a road trip to a couple of small towns in Minnesota. The spectacle of chain store sprawl along Interstate 94 from Minneapolis to St. Cloud is an amazing and appalling sight, a late-stage cancer of the landscape. It isn't any different or necessarily worse than thousands of other sprawl corridors around the nation, but it portends a destiny just as dark. On the whole, the public does not apprehend the danger it represents to our future.

He uses another term to describe this - it begins with cluster.... I will not complete the rest but it is an accurate, if profane, description.

This nonesense is occuring all over America - why must we encourage it here? Back in the 1970's when Harold Smith, Jim Beson and Cecil Bracken worked to bring water services to the Powedersville area did it occur with county funds? Was there a sales tax to encourage the project? NO. In fact the project only worked because enough existing citizens joined together to incorporate the water company. This was "Just-in-time" growth.

The idea of "building it and they will come" looks good on paper - the result is however something much less appealing.

Anderson will, and should grow. It is the nature of things. However, we have a real chance to shape the nature of that growth. Reacting to percieved immediate needs while fundementally ignoring that which is important and permemant is wrong - it is the product of a failed ideology. Progressivism has and will never produce anythg of great or lasting worth.

If Anderson County is to have a sales tax let it serve the purpose of reducing another tax - not as a means to expand governemnt. Reduce or eliminate property taxes and let the citizens of Anderson be truly free to own their own homes. A sales tax for any other reason than the reduction of a current tax would simply be wrong.

Perhaps Joshua is correct and folks like this ought to read a little Wendell Berry before attempting to fundementally change the nature of a place and the people that call that place home.

Friday, November 24, 2006

Blue Laws and Anderson County

First reading of an ordinance to permanently suspend the Blue Laws was approved Tuesday night by the Anderson County Council. Blue Laws prohibit residents from buying anything other than groceries or medicine before 1:30 p.m. on Sundays. (Anderson Independent)

I cannot imagine why such a proposal came up in the first place. Even if you were to theoretically remove the notion that the Sabbath should be respected, not working on Sundays is a cultural thing. It is a time to spend time with that which is really important. Working and making money are means to an end; in the culture I grew up with family were infinitely more important - even to all of my unchurched neighbors. From the story above we find the answer.

"I'm a Yankee," said David Allan, a Liberty resident. "You can get rid of all the Blue Laws you want to. If a business wants to be open, they should be able to stay open. If they want to be closed, they should be able to stay closed."

I am generally in agreement that government ought not attempt to legislate morality - at least not on small things. I am for individual freedom and responsibility - however as a paleoconservative I am fully willing to accept local government encroachment on individual rights if that encroachment protects longstanding community traditions and the local culture. In reality this "encroachment" does not in any way offend individual rights. In the current example a fellow like David Allan never has to live or work in Anderson County - he does not have to even visit. It was his option to come to Anderson. When you move to a place you should be willing to accept and attempt to integrate into the local culture - in this case family and faith have traditionally been more important than profit. Mr. Allan you might have done well to figure that out before you came down our way.

The fact is it is ok to slow down the pace of life a little - take time out to focus on what is really important. These are the traits that have made our culture so great - it is a shame to sell all of that for a few extra hours at the Wal-Mart!

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Anderson County Sells Out to Fear and Tyranny

In a letter dated October 30, the SC Law Enforcement Division (SLED) informed the County of the successful results of its annual review of Anderson County’s Homeland Security funds. Read more...

Well the discerning among us have to ask the question...why on God's green Earth does Anderson County need any funding from the Department of Homeland Insecurity? Make no mistake these are Federal dollars with Federal strings attached--

Anderson County has received $1,137,587 in Homeland Security Grant funds since 2003.

[...]

All FEMA and Homeland Security grant monies are also included as part of the County's annual external audit. In particular, the amounts are included in the Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards. The County's commitment to following General Accounting Practices and Procedures also includes employing a CPA within the Emergency Services division.

The requirement to hire a CPA is but one of the more obvious "strings". What is not so obvious is the control and infringement upon our good county and her duly elected officials; most notably the office of high sheriff.

Does Anderson County really need Federal dollars to secure the "homeland", our homeland. You must remember the Department of Homeland Insecurity is the exact same bunch that believes they need the power to spy on ordinary citizens, feel up grandmas at airports and turn a blind eye to border incursions. Are these the fellows that should come down from their headquarters far away and tell Anderson County how to keep our home secure?

I think not. Take a stroll over to Clemson and visit the home of John C. Calhoun - go over to Williamston and take a gander at the monument to the Citadel Cadets that fired the last shot of The War west of the Mississippi, go sit down with some good ole boys at one of our local volunteer fire departments. We know how to defend our homes with words and actions.

Sheriff David Crenshaw is the highest lawman in the county, is he not? Common law, tradition and our own State Constitution would say so. If need be he can call out every man of good conscience and character to assist him; we don't need your Federal dollars, rules or meddling Mr. Department of Homeland Insecurity - go peddle your fear and bureaucracy elsewhere. You and your money have no place in Anderson County.

Friday, November 17, 2006

Alan Keyes

"If we were still the people that we claim to be, we would have watered the tree of liberty several times over the last several decades." Alan Keyes

Here is an excellent video on the subject of State's Rights and The Constitution, a bit large but worthwhile.

Laws have validity only when the people consent and when they are executed within the constrants of the governing contract (neither really apply in the current paradigm). It seems high time to force change or submit forever to the usurpation of our rights and our birthright.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Is It Time For a 3rd Party?

The total implosion of the "Republican" Congress on Tuesday and the GOP sprint toward getting out of Iraq by 2008 to retain the White House raise two more important questions. Will the Republican nominee for president in 2008 be nominally "pro-life" and "pro-marriage" (not like any of them actually are, but their claims allow Religious Right leaders to hide behind lies)? And if the candidate is NOT, what will Falwell, Dobson and Robertson do? That is the very interesting question!

I don't believe the GOP nominee will give lipservice to a "pro-life" stance, and FINALLY we will find out if the neo-con leaders of the "Religious Right" serve Christ or Cesar. The nominating race of 2008 will be the most fascinating political event in our lives because of this consequence. When faced with two pro-aborts in the general election what will religious leaders do?

I've seen some calls for the leaders of the Religious Right to create a national 3rd party for social conservatives, and I want to register my dissent for such an idea... sort of! Their version of a national 3rd party will involve spending money and resources in all 50 States of the Union (including MA, CA, VT, NY, etc.), a surefire recipe for failure and waste. Furthermore, their party would likely call for compliance with unconstitutional, illegal acts from Washington until such a time as we finally win at the national level - a day never to be seen. Christians, those who actually live, act and believe like true Christians, are outnumbered in America and we'll lose at the national level abysmally.

I said I dissent "sort of," because I do favor a large 3rd party for Christians, but it must be a REGIONAL party built upon the doctrine of non-compliance with illegal edicts from Washington. It must be built upon the foundation of Acts 5:29, "We must obey God rather than men." It must raise up the doctrines of interposition and nullification as defended by Jefferson, Madison, Calhoun, and recently Judge Roy Moore. It must be regional because Massachusetts, California, New York, Illinois, et. al., are roadblocks in attempting to defend the unborn, marriage, and free religious expression. No money or time should be wasted attempting to convince Sodom & Gomorrah States to elect righteous men and women - instead, missionaries should be sent there to save as many souls before fire from Heaven rains down on them, so to speak. No money or time should be wasted in trying to elect a president to the government of a nation that despises God. Rather, all efforts should be made regionally to line up godly men in defiance to the evil Washington seeks to impose upon States and municipalities.

Any political party raised up by Christians for defense of Christian principles must be regional and must be built upon Acts 5:29. Any other effort is doomed to failure.

Monday, October 23, 2006

A Family Finds Christian Exodus AFTER Moving to SC

We know the Lord works in mysterious ways, so it shouldn't surprise us that although CE endeavors to inform people of our existence and THEN help them move, sometimes God moves them before anything else!

We received the following letter from a family that recently moved to South Carolina. It was a great encouragement to myself and other CE officers, so we thought you'd like to be encouraged as well. I've kept it anonymous for the privacy of our member.
Hi, I Really believe God is in the Christian Exodus. My family and I recently moved to Easley SC and really didn't know why we chose Easley, well let me say I thought I knew why, but God's plan is "the plan" and he was involved. We sold our house very quickly in [Florida] after praying to God that if it wasn't his will for us to move than don't allow us to sell. Well we sold it right at the top of the real estate bubble, which worked out nicely for us.

I hadn't heard of Christian Exodus and it wasn't the reason we moved, but God didn't have to tell us that, he just got us here. A few days before we were leaving, my wife and I heard a man speak on CNN or some other network about what the Christian Exodus was and my wife and I looked at each other and stared at each other in amazement. What is more amazing is that we had been living in Easley for a couple of months before we realized we lived in Anderson County. Go figure.

We sold everything and moved here and I wasn't going to let my job-Which is not my security, keep me from making this move and most importantly God strengthened us inside of this move.

You can believe what you want, but I believe God wants to gather up his sons in SC for some reason and he doesn't have to tell us exactly why right now, but in due time if it's his will he will. All he wants us to do is obey him and make the move by Faith. Don't miss out on what God is going to do here,I know without a doubt that it is going to be awesome. Remember God used one man, Moses to lead his people to another place, and I believe he is using Cory to do the same.

Also, you will Love it here, I can assure you of this. Cost of living and real estate is so much cheaper from where I moved. All we owe the lender is our mortgage payment, we were able to pay of all credit card debt pay cash for a brand new car and pay off our other car in full. We are very close to debt free living. It feels good!!!Don't be afraid; don't let fear keep you from what God wants to do with you and in SC. We are so glad we did and so will you!!!!!

May God bless you and your family,
J.

The Last Best Hope

I am faced with a paradox - I am gladdened and saddened by the evaporation of the Constitution Party on the national level.

There are two issues at play -

First real Constitutionalist ought to realize that issues of social morality are states' rights issues. The fact that the Constitution Party has imploded over such an issue reflects a basic misunderstanding of the proper role and scope of the Federal government. (I have the highest respect for Michael Peroutka and his views on this matter, as well as folks like Buffy in Arkansas - I just disagree on the principle of what a national party ought to get involved in).

Second, I do not live in a fantasy world - I know full well that no matter what principles we constitutional conservative republicans (my term for inclusiveness) hold dear the fact is that the Federal Government BELIEVES that it ought to be involved in legislation of social morality. As such, to ignore an articulation of policies on such matters by a party such as the Constitution Party would be foolish and disingenuous. So from the stand point of reality I completely agree with all of the state parties that have disaffiliated with the national Constitution Party.

Something significant has occurred - sure the National CP still clings to a forlorn hope of becoming a viable third party but that is now a pipe dream. What we are left with is a smattering of state parties that may have some success locally but can never hope to achieve even respectable numbers in a national election.

The Constitution Party was the last best hope for reform at the national level. Chuck Baldwin declares that the GOP rightly deserves to lose in two weeks. I would argue that the Democrats are just as guilty as the GOP and do not deserve to win either - after all there is no real difference in socialist Democrats (with fascist tendencies) and fascist Republicans (with socialist tendencies).

Cory began Christian Exodus with the premise that reform at the national level is impossible, the system is too corrupt and polluted. Yet many of us held out hope - we are patriots, we were raised to love an ideal. The ideal is just that, it does not exist in the realm of reality. The reality is that nothing short of divine intervention by God himself will right the course of the United States government.

The disaffiliation of several state Constitution Party affiliates is a significant step toward accepting this reality - it is a statement of separation and secession of sorts. It is an acknowledgement that change can and will only occur by our hands at the local and state level.

We are still a divided people, a small minority in every place we live. The act of separation by the various state chapters is a correct course of action but it is not enough - we will still lose every major fight. We are separated and alone and without collective resources.

The only hope for victory is to concentrate our resources and forces in a place and at a time of our choosing.

Dum Spiro Spero,

El Cid

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Civic Duties and Christian Ministries are NOT Mutually Exclusive

Christian Exodus (CE) consistently gets objections from Christians like this one:
Your choice to influence society will ultimately meet with failure, because you have decided to stoop to the level of the world in order to bring about your Godly revolution.

We, as Christain people, must influence the world around us one person at a time. We cannot force our faith on others, or establish theocratic rule in order to get what we want.

Do you want the number of abortions to go down? Offer to care for the women and the children who find themselves in the desperate situation of having to make the choice between adoption, abortion, and life.
Many Christians terribly misunderstand the role of government, and the civic responsibilities of Christians. CE does not propose using government to "force our faith on others" nor do we intend to use it to "bring about [our] Godly revolution." I'm always amazed at the words chosen and the concepts created out of thin air by others. Neither of these two accusations can even remotely be derived from anything stated on our website. CE, and everything on our website, is involved in influencing government toward its proper role as a defender of God-given rights and liberties. Our proposals for legislative change exclusively involve defense of liberties and rights, they do not involve using government to force the Gospel on anyone. Even more disconcerting is that the statements quoted above hold the position that Christians have no civic responsibility whatsoever. This is evidenced by the suggestion that our concern regarding abortion should ONLY be to help needy mothers. Do we have no duty to change the government that sanctions such killing? Nowhere does CE suggest that we are not to help expectant mothers contemplating abortion. Christians are to do both individual ministry toward these women AND we're to fulfill our civic duty in enacting legislation to protect the lives of unborn children. Christians who agree with the above quotes suffer from the very frequent misconception that Christian ministries and duties are mutually exclusive. In other words, that we cannot minister to the expectant mother while also enacting legislation to protect innocent children. Of course, that misconception is nonsense, but unfortunately all too prevalent among the body of Christ.

CE is a project created for a specific purpose; namely, to provide Christians the means to fulfill their civic duties. There are plenty of other wonderful organizations enabling Christians to fulfill other ministerial needs - as one example, my wife and I give on a monthly basis to a crisis pregnancy ministry in East Texas that helps young women with the exact issues described above. Just as it is not a crisis pregnancy ministry's purpose to help Christians fulfill their civic duties, it is not CE's purpose to help Christians pursue their other ministries. Demanding that CE be something it was not created to be is like demanding that the crisis pregnancy ministry become a food and clothing shelter for the homeless. No one foolishly demands that other ministries depart from their purpose, so why demand it of Christian Exodus?

Independence for South Carolina must be peaceful

Christian Exodus occasionally hears from respondents that secession from the Union is "insane." Well, independence from the other States in the union is only "insane" when coupled with an assumption that it would be violently attained. This is of course the very first conclusion uninformed Americans make when they hear the word "secession". A State declaring independence today would be entirely different than in 1776 or 1861, because a global public relations campaign is all that'd be necessary to succeed. Let's look at how it could play out: if South Carolinians voted for independence at the ballot box, the case would then have to be made in international discourse that our vote is just as sovereign as any other people's vote, and a demand would be made that Washington and the United Nations recognize that fact. Should they recognize it, the vote would stand. Should they deny recognition and send in troops to disband our government then the world would witness Washington's tyranny, and at the very next opportunity we should vote for independence again, and again, and again, continually demanding freedom and demonstrating to the world that the "land of the free" aint so free. South Carolina should stay that course until eventually the other States of the involuntary union cannot stomach their own hypocrisy and finally acquiesce and let "freedom ring." That's the peaceful path to independence if ever required. No weapon would ever be used except the ballot box.

South Carolina could never forcefully demand independence with military use - that would be "insane."

Prison Camps for Americans at the Hands of Republicans

Many of you are already well aware of Bush's intent to be able to imprison whomever he wishes for any length of time whatsoever without bringing the prisoner before a court. On Tuesday he will sign into law the Military Commissions Act (S. 3930) allowing him to declare U.S. citizens (that's you and me) to be "unlawful enemy combatants." (http://www.alternet.org/rights/42458/) Now, you might reply that you're not concerned because the administration would have to demonstrate some reason for detaining you, and under normal circumstances that's correct. You'd be referring to your right of habeas corpus (literally meaning to "bring the body out") ensuring that your case is heard before a court of law to determine whether you can lawfully be detained. However, this outrageous piece of legislation allows the president to suspend habeas corpus rights, thereby enabling our indefinite detainment without trial. Aren't we so lucky that the "Christian conservative" Republican party is in power in Washington to protect our liberties? If you still believe that lie about the Republicans then I have to ask which planet you've been living on the past 5 years.

The only silver lining here is that I do believe the U.S. Supreme Court will strike down this legislation or certain parts of it as obviously unconstitutional. What will be VERY interesting to see is how Roberts and Alito will rule. I think the left-wingers will strike it down out of sheer political opposition to anything and everything that has Bush's fingerprints on it - certainly a case of lemons being made into lemonade. Of course, Scalia and Thomas will decide the legislation unlawful, but I'm very intrigued to see how the two Bush appointees (centralist government liberals by most measures) will rule. And so, the plot thickens!

Friday, October 06, 2006

The Bed They Made

It appears all but certain that the GOP will lose control of the house. It is also clear that the grand ole party may be in the process of imploding. Not that this surprises any real paleoconservative. The leadership of the Republican party log ago got in bed with economic liberals and corporate warmongers (the neocons). To maintain and expand their powerbase they also formed alliances with what can only be termed as social liberals (closeted in some instances but social liberals all the same). This they did while proclaiming to be the party of traditional conservatism. No wonder they are facing the mess with Mark Foley. No surprise that this very week young soldiers are fighting and dying to secure the capital of a country we supposedly secured over three years ago.


Seems also the neocon warmongering and quagmire in Iraq and tough talk toward Iran has embolden North Korea. The GOP has more problems than they are intellectually or morally equipped to handle.

Our "conservative" leaders have been seduced by socialism, corporatism, militarism and nationalism - that my friends equals fascism in the classic sense of the word. They have lost their way and in doing so have abandoned the principles of the republic and the values of the millions of Christians that support them with votes and money.

Some folks even talk now with a straight face about the very real possibility of a Hillary presidency.

We paleoconservatives ought not worry though. The GOP and their hypocritical talk of conservatism only serves to rob from us many supporters that agree with us. Let the GOP sleep in the bed it has made, let them lose the white house and Congress. We have the solution that real conservatives seek - we know exactly how to put the Federal Government back in its place and restore our republic.

Technorati tags: , ,

Saturday, September 30, 2006

New Site Feed

We have a new site feed located here. All posts from our blog here will post there. If you enjoy aggregating your favorite blogs and news items this service might prove useful to you. On the feed site just take a gander at the top right hand corner for easy options that do not require any special skills or software.

And as always site owners, fellow bloggers and anyone else is free to syndicate our content using RSS, ATOM or XML so long as a link back here remains intact and the content is not altered.

Shouting from the Mountaintop

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

The 14th Amendment Proven Illegal

I've known for quite some time that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was never lawfully ratified and is therefore null and void. However, it's far and few between that I've come across a concise essay pulling together all the historical facts surrounding the 14th Amendment and all the historical proofs that it was not ratified. As many of you are aware, the federal courts have used the 14th Amendment to effectively erase the 10th Amendment placing virtually nothing beyond the reach of the federal government. If the War of Northern Agression conceived our modern consolidated government, the 14th Amendment is the beating heart enabling the beast to grow unencumbered. Elimination of the 14th Amendment would immediately revert America back to a decentralized federation rather than a consolidated nation; i.e. States would once again control all domestic affairs reserved to them by the 10th Amendment.

Therefore, if you have not yet done so, you simply MUST inform yourself about the illegal actions that resulted in the implementation of the 14th Amendment. The following evidence presented in Congress on June 13, 1967 proves the illegality of the 14th Amendment and will shock and anger you that this despotism occurred in America:

www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/sup/Congressional_Record_14th_Amend_1967.pdf

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

States vs. Feds

Fredericksburg.com - "THINK THE BATTLE OVER states' rights is over? Not so: At the National Governors Association summer meeting in Charleston, S.C., Democrats and Republicans alike are lashing out at the federal government for its intrusion into issues formerly within the purview of the states and its incompetence in dealing with national problems. Somewhere, John C. Calhoun is grinning. "

Charleston (the place of my birth) is a good location for this type of discussion. We will see if the talk is just that or if the people are also ready to tell the Federal government that enough is enough.

Sign the Declaration of States' Rights

Sunday, July 30, 2006

Paleo-conservative Leaders Have No Viable Solutions

An excellent constitutionalist whose columns I enjoy reading very much, recently described three things that paleo-conservatives can do to help fix America. Well, I have to say that none of the three will work if indeed we define success as actually fixing government in America. None of the three will actually change government anywhere in this country.

I'm writing about this not to attack the good intentions of the other author, but rather to point out that no one in nationwide paleo-conservative circles actually has a plan for success other than Christian Exodus. We are the ONLY project or organization that can actually succeed as America hurtles at light speed into fascist socialism. Here are the three solutions offered by this other well-meaning patriot:
  1. Educate your neighbors
  2. Join a 3rd party
  3. Change your pastor
Let me acknowledge that all three efforts are good and must be undertaken; I'm not for a minute suggesting that Christian Exodus' strategy and these other three are mutually exclusive. But I'll now point out to you that the other three won't succeed on their own or even in conjunction with each other, unless employed by Christian Exodus.

First, for education to be the solution we'd have to re-educate Americans faster than the tens of thousands of public schools: elementary, middle and high schools, junior colleges and universities. And I don't mean re-educate Americans at a faster rate, we'd actually have to re-educate in greater numbers. This is a total impossibility. No matter how many people we talk to, how many websites or newspapers or radio stations or television shows or universities or Christian schools or think tanks or institutes we launch we will NEVER pump out greater numbers of paleo-conservatives than the billion dollar government institutions. According to the National Center for Education Statistics there were 48.2 million students enrolled in public elementary or secondary schools in 2002 as compared to only 6.4 million in private schools nationwide. Keep in mind that even most private school students end up useless cogs in the corporatist systems loyal to the fascist government now ruling us. So unless someone has a plan to move 30+ millions of those government school children to greatly improved private schools don't bore me with malarkey about education being a solution to our country's problems. To date there is no such possibility at the national level despite the good efforts of Separation of School & State. A slightly more plausible plan is that of Exodus Mandate in the State of South Carolina to eliminate all government schools statewide. But the best possibility in the near term is for Christian Exodus to gain control of a county and eliminate government schools there. Attempting to re-educate Americans nationwide will never make up the ground necessary to reacquire limited government founded upon Christian principles.

The second proposed solution is the creation of a viable third party at the national level. Let me give four examples to prove that this is no solution whatsoever: the States' Rights Party, the Reform Party, the Libertarian Party, and the Constitution Party. Despite being well funded the first two-examples were relevant for only a short time, because they did not focus on local politics but rather on national, and to win at the national level was impossible for them. The 3rd example still fails to make any in-roads at the national level even after several decades of existence. Its most famous politician today, Congressman Ron Paul, runs as a Republican so that he can actually win in his Texas district. Consequently, the Libertarian Party has now adopted the same strategy as Christian Exodus in the form of the Free State Project. The FSP enjoys the endorsement of 11 State Libertarian parties. If only the Constitution Party were so wise as to endorse Christian Exodus. But alas the 4th example recently imploded over debate about abortion and most 100% pro-life States are now disaffiliating from the national party. So while the fledgling Constitution Party disintegrates at the national level, what have some of its leaders now called for? A new 3rd party of all things; this one smaller than the last Constitution Party! I can't understand such foolishness.

I must clarify that I am for the establishment and building of alternative political parties... at the local and State levels. I will help build the Constitution Party of South Carolina. I will pay my dues to it, and I will recruit members. And as we get Constitutionalists elected to local office, and then the General Assembly, and then Statewide offices, the voters of South Carolina will have a real alternative to the Republicrats. But I'll not send my money, nor give of my time, to build a national 3rd party where all efforts since and including 1860 have proven fruitless wastes of resources. Nor am I deluded enough to believe that item #1 above, the re-education of Americans, will be successful enough to make a national paleo-conservative party electable. Under no circumstances will Christian constitutionalists ever be a majority in America. But we might be able to become a majority of activists in one small State like South Carolina. The crux of the matter is whether to invest in saving our State, or to waste our time and resources trying to redeem the unredeemable.

Lastly regarding supposed solution #3, I heartily agree that we should select pastors with an unwavering commitment to preach the truth regardless of whether it tickles the ears of their congregations. Pastors who squarely challenge unrighteousness and call upon their flock to actively engage our culture are far and few between, and we should support the few who do with our attendance, time and tithes. However, this will not actually change government at any level anywhere in our country. This solution really amounts to nothing more than the employment of item #1: education. That's what pastors do. They educate their churches. They teach. Supporting a pastor and his church amounts to being an educational influence in your community. So there's really no difference between solution #1 and solution #3, the latter simply being one platform from which to implement the former.

I have just taken the best answers that a brilliant constitutionalist leader had to offer to the question "what can we do", and have demonstrated that they're wholly ineffectual at changing government in America. In fact this is the sad truth about the paleo-conservative movement in America: its leaders have no real solutions. If you continue to follow their lead, you'll spend the rest of your life identifying how America has gone wrong, complaining until you're blue in the face about it, and doing nothing that will actually stop it.

I have a better plan. Stop spending time reading paleo-conservative blogs and websites (like this one) and get over to some job websites. Find yourself employment in one of these counties in South Carolina: Spartanburg, Greenville, Anderson, Pickens, Lexington or Dorchester. Then move your family there and get busy working with us to elect constitutionalists to county council, county sheriff, and State Assembly. Then we'll eliminate property taxes, abortion, government schools, illegal immigration, and implement a specie-backed currency (such as outlined at www.goldmoneybill.com) all at the county level. That's what I'm doing, and that's an action plan for real success! Join us at www.ChristianExodus.org.

Thursday, July 27, 2006

The Real Problem with the Federal Constitution

The following is a small sample of an article by Rev. Andrew Sandlin (CRE) at the National Reform Association website. Read the whole thing! Now!

"The main problem with the framers of the Constitution was not, in fact, that they pulled off a Deistic or secularist coup d'e tat, but that they lacked the foresight to realize the possibility of the emergence of an anti-Christian ethos capable of employing a chiefly procedural political document to undermine the Christian Faith. The Federal Constitution, in fact, is largely such a procedural, rather than substantive, document. While all procedures imply a substantive presupposition (which for the Constitution is Christian), it is evident the framers were only interested in marking out the bare guidelines of a federal system of government, and while presuming the covenantal or contractual character of civil government, did not position themselves to create a formal covenant with God similar to the Scottish
Solemn League and Covenant. Recall too that at this time the various states were almost little countries, and the union essentially a confederation of these states. Significantly, most of the the states' constitutions required a religious (Christian) profession for office, and thus the framers' intent in writing the Constitution was not to explicate their religious views but to fashion the guidelines of a federal system of government. The point is not that a state or constitution can be religiously neutral (the great secularist illusion of our times), but that the framers did not feel obliged (rightly or wrongly) to explicate their religious convictions in what they saw as a procedural document. If I draw a map for another theonomic Christian, giving directions to a church at which I am preaching or lecturing, I do not place at the top, "And recall we must always follow the law-word of God in all our travels, wherever they may be." Theonomic Christians already know this."

Monday, July 24, 2006

States' Rights Review: Pro-Lifers are Noble, but Gullible

Lee hits another deep ball....
"I realize this may sound like blasphemy in a land ruled by black-robed tyrants, but judges are not gods. Unfortunately, pro-lifers like Bordlee and Nikas continue to buy into the notion that federal judges are above the Constitution and that only they can set things right. What we need are representatives in Congress with the courage to stand up for life, law, and liberty and impeach those judges who seek to legislate from the bench." Read More....

El Cid

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Review of Freedom to Fascism

The Wisdom of George Orwell: One of our compatriots in the Vermont Independence movement (yes, different state and different political agenda but seekers of State liberty all the same). Has written an informative review of America Freedom to Fascism. Check the review out here.

The release date for the film is 28 July. It is possible that a man like Russo will be able to tell the story of Leviathan in a way that has yet to be told (to the general public at least). I await with great hope that the truths this film highlights will greatly benefit our cause and the cause of freedom and liberty.

Just to think, most of us 30 somethings going on 40 thought reading George Orwell's 1984 in highschool was just another assignment. One could never know back then it was future history.

Dum Spiro Spero
El Cid

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Why join Christian Exodus?

When asked "why" Christian Exodus is necessary, I often respond, "To glorify Jesus Christ." Ask yourselves these questions: will it glorify Christ for South Carolina to end abortion within its borders? Will it glorify Christ for South Carolina to terminate taxpayer funding of government indoctrination centers (a.k.a. public schools)? Will it glorify Christ for individuals to remain secure in their property without threat of confiscation should they be unable to afford property taxes? Will it glorify Christ for individuals to be able to proclaim the Gospel in any public forum whatsoever? Will it glorify Christ to see God's Law (such as the 10 Commandments) posted prominently in public displays reminding viewers of their responsibilities to God and to their fellow man?

We know that all these things, and many more we can accomplish via CE, will glorify our Lord. And THAT is why Christian Exodus is necessary! Please join us today at ChristianExodus.org.