What is it in the liberal psyche that
would want to see children unprotected and undefended from mass
murder? Who can understand such a mindset?
I believe that the root of such
thinking has no rational grounds, but comes from a primal
subconscious motivation, related to suppressed feelings of guilt over
acts of sexual immorality.
The key to discerning the source of
this thought, is to see how those who wish to see children undefended
from deadly violence, also support the murder of defenseless unborn
children in the womb, who are often the product of sexually immoral
acts, which they personally take pleasure in.
All humans deal with natural feelings
of sexual desire. Like fire when confined to a stove, these desires
serve a good and useful purpose, when they are channeled in a
controlled manner towards the production of legitimate children.
Those who cast off such restraints, and let their desires burn out of
control, often couple their behaviors with the willful destruction of
the fruit of copulation, through their use of birth control and the
practice of abortion.
This ancient relationship between
sexual immorality and the murder of children, is continuous
throughout human history, tracing its origins back to the Babylonian
mystery religions; where the worship of the mysteries is played out
through the linked practices of temple prostitution and ritual child
While they might not profess any
religious belief, those who engage in fornication and adultery,
together with birth control and abortion, or those who practice
unfruitful sexual behaviors like homosexuality, also support gun
control. Their secret addiction to a forbidden pleasure, constrains
them to join this cherished sin to a corollary desire to see children
left undefended from slaughter.
While they might express shock or
dismay over the mass murder of children, their primal reaction to
such atrocities is to rationalize a course of action that would leave
children undefended, and so encourage the repetition of such
While they habitually snuff out the
fruit of their own passions, they also continually repress the
corresponding feelings of guilt, for which they cannot accept
responsibility. The reflexive way in which they can assuage these
feelings of guilt, is to project them upon others, and accept
atonement for them from their higher power. They project guilt upon
gun owners, and accept atonement for their guilt through unlimited
mental submission to their higher power, which is the government.
They cannot address the question “Why
do I feel guilty?” Surely it cannot be because of an addiction
to sinful sexual practices and the extinguishing of my offspring. It
must be the fault of others who cause such subconscious horror. It
must be the fault of gun owners. Relief comes from complete trust
to their god of power, which is embodied in the fully-armed arm of
This is ironic, since they might also
protest against the unwarranted over-extension of police powers, in a
way that might inhibit their selfish indulgences. Yet when it comes
to the use of deadly force, they implicitly trust the government with
guns. This trust is what gives them temporal relief from their own
suppressed feelings of guilt.
Deep in their heart, they know that
they cannot be trusted to control their own primal passions; so they
imbue other mortals like themselves, sanctified by an official
uniform, with the sole responsibility for the use of deadly force.
This is a fundamental weakness of human
nature. Those who have been morally compromised through slavery to
their own sinful desires, also subject themselves to slavery to a
diabolical higher power. In so doing, they implicitly support the
continued practice of child sacrifice, whether it be at the hand of a
government making war upon defenseless civilians, a mother torturing
her own unborn child to death, or a mass murderer shooting young
children in a school.